Needles in the Flock Haystack

Leave a comment

Image generated by Gemini AI

On September 10, 2026, I filed a California Public Records Act request of the City of Visalia, and the Visalia Police Department. On October 5, I got my response.

A lot to digest there, but let’s start with “5. The Department’s case/incident number is withheld.” A lot of verbiage to deny giving me the case numbers associated with each incident that was allegedly solved with the use of the Flock ALPR system.

They’re also saying they don’t have to release “arrest and incident information” that is more than a year old, and that “much” of my requested information predates that by “many months”, but they are giving it to me (minus what they decided to withhold) “in the interest of transparency”.

They tell me how generous they were being by including information that was more than a year old, citing a court case that they claim means they didn’t have to.

Visalia, I hate to say it, but “transparency” went out the window a long time ago. (Encrypting police radio transmissions and removing a data field on the Flock transparency page was just the beginning.)

Other information gleaned from the “response” –

From January 1, 2025 through May 29, 2026, there were 123 incidents solved which were attributed to Flock ALPR use by the Visalia Police Department.

To justify mass surveillance, proponents of ALPR systems often talk about two types of incidents: missing persons, and stolen cars. In Visalia’s record, there are no cases of missing persons found using the Flock system. Out of 123 incidents that were attributed to the Flock system, only 45 are stolen vehicles.

Six were violent crimes – assault with a deadly weapon, armed robbery, and a home invasion.

The rest of the cases “solved” by Flock ALPR data are not classified as violent crimes.

I had asked for location information, as well. Either addresses of incidents, or the hundred block and street name. They refused to provide that, stating the “existing” data only listed VPD “area” zones, and they didn’t have to provide the address or location information more detailed than that.

In the time period covered by the data released, Flock ALPR cameras took more than 5,950,000 images of license plates. Perhaps many more. The “transparency” page lists an average monthly “unique plate reads” of more than 300,000 every 30 days. Multiply that by the 17 months of data released, and the total number surveillance images is staggering.

And, at $3,000 a year per camera, expensive. (The cameras are not bought by and owned by Visalia. They are a subscription. The cameras and related equipment remain the property of Flock.)

Mt. Whitney High School 2026

Leave a comment

The next steps being taken on Mt. Whitney High School’s upgrade are in process. The Visalia Unified School District is working on drawing up plans to build a new administration, library, and classroom buildings. The first stage is a two-story admin/library/classroom building in currently vacant space on the campus, followed by the demolition of the current admin/classroom building and the construction of a new, single-story classroom building.

The big issue for many Mt. Whitney alumni, and other interested citizens, is the preservation of a large oak tree on the campus. It’s dedicated to the memory of “The Winningest Coach in Pioneer History”, Douglas P. Rudolf. Coach Rudolf was at Mt. Whitney from 1969 to 2012. Early presentations showed one of the new buildings sitting directly where the memorial and historic oak currently exist.

Screenshot

The District heard loud and clear from the public, as well as Whitney alumni and teachers (current and retired), that removal of the tree and memorial was not acceptable. The have adjusted their plans accordingly.

The District, in current presentations, is saying the tree and memorial will be preserved.

The other trees in the same area will probably not survive the project. One is clearly dying, if not already dead. The others may not be able to, one, survive the construction-caused disruption to the ground in the area, and two, may end up being too close to the new buildings to allow them to remain.

On the left, the memorial tree to be preserved. The others to the right are likely destined to be removed. At least one of them is dying/dead.
The Mt. Whitney High School Campus, and the planned new construction.

Final design work is being done now, and the District will be holding more public meetings to inform the public of the plans, and to take input on those designs. The District has not, as yet, determined the exact footprints of the buildings, nor their final appearance.

Current timelines have construction of the new, two-story, building beginning in June of 2028, and taking 13 months. There is no current timeline on demolition and replacement of the current admin building, but bids are expected in March of 2028.

Funding is from 2018’s Measure A, of $37 million, “other” funding of $36 million, for a total project cost of $73 million. In several years time, grant funds of $33 million will come from the State of California as part of the project. That money will go to other projects in the District. (In a confusing (to me, anyway) government shuffle, in about three years the state of California will provide funds designated for this project. Money from the bond will then be “freed up”, and be available for other projects.)

Stay tuned.

Tell Me About This Particular Flock Camera

Leave a comment

On August 26, 2016, I filed a California Public Records Act request with the City of Visalia regarding this particular Flock camera. It’s located on Demaree Street, just south of Goshen Avenue, in Visalia. When I noticed it one day driving by, I had questions.

There are all kinds of requirements for things close to city streets, especially for those items in the public right-of-way. I decided to check to see if those requirements had been met for this installation. I wrote a very involved public records request about it, and got my reply today.

The response was underwhelming.

Either most of my request was ignored, or the City let this thing be put up with almost no oversight, and in violation of it’s own documents regarding the installation.

Here’s the complete response to my request. I’ll add the entire request at the end of this blog, as it’s quite extensive.

More

Another Day, Another Public Records Request

Leave a comment

The “Training Bulletin” for the Visalia Police Department, dated January 16, 2025 contains the following sentence:

“Any successfully investigated case and/or arrest that involved the use of a Flock ALPR shall be logged in Spillman under Circumstances Code FLOCK.”

Spillman is the program which basically runs the Sheriff’s Office. Dispatch enters calls with it, it controls the Records data, and provides statistical information, among many other things.

Since the Visalia Police Department has indicated that the Flock Automated License Plate Reader system has been instrumental in a dramatic decrease in auto thefts, I’ve decided to see just how effective it actually has been. I want to see every incident they’ve attributed to the Flock cameras since this bulletin became operative.

The City’s lawyers have given themselves until October 15, 2026 to respond to my request.

Tulare County Fair’s Proposed Data Center

Leave a comment

Image: Google Earth

There’s been a recent public outcry about the possibility of a data center being sited on the property of the Tulare County Fairgrounds. Many county residents are adamantly opposed to the idea, and have flooded the last two Fair Board meetings with public comments. The proposal, while not a full-blown data center of the type most imagine when hearing the term, the “resilience center” does include what is called an “edge computing center”. The project is part of a state-funded initiative to improve disaster response capabilities.

Global Stack USA has proposed numerous projects across California, usually at a county fairground site. Offers of building a “resilience center” at no cost to the fairgrounds is tempting for fair boards who are constantly trying to keep their fairs budgets in the black.

There are at least two flies in the ointment of these proposals, though. One is a 99 year lease, and the other is the data center.

With lots of misinformation floating around about just what is being proposed by Global Stack USA (a company less than a year old), I decided to get some facts directly from the horse’s mouth, as it were. I’ve made another Public Records Act request.

More

Tulare Co. Sheriff’s Office gets new drones

Leave a comment

Image: Motorola

At the June 23, 2026, Tulare County Board of Supervisor’s meeting, the Tulare County Sheriff’s Office was authorized to implement plans to operate a “Drone As First Responder” program. Purchased through Motorola, the system will, in the Sheriff’s Office words, “enhance operational efficiency, officer safety, emergency response capabilities, and public safety operations through implementation of a Drone as First Responder (DFR) program utilizing the Motorola Solutions BRINC drone platform.”

The Supervisors, in a consent calendar item not pulled (no public presentation or discussion), approved the proposal. There is no cost for the first year of the program. If, after a year-long “test program”, the County wishes to continue, the cost is just under $560,000 a year, for four more years. The Sheriff’s Office plans to use AB 109 Public Safety Realignment grant funding to pay for the cost of this program.

The Sheriff’s Office has used drones for several years, but these models are a technological leap in capabilities. Previously, a Deputy would have to respond to a scene and deploy a drone from their patrol vehicle. With this system, the drones can be deployed from fixed as well as mobile locations.

More

‘Karen’ demands City of Visalia “fire” me

Leave a comment

It’s been an interesting summer. It’s ending on a (not so) high note, as someone has tried to get me kicked off the Visalia City Council’s Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). Can you guess who it was, and why? Here’s the letter sent to the City Council and the City representative on the Advisory Committee:

Here’s the cover letter for his email:

I would agree with one thing in his letter. “…minor children are entirely uninvolved.” There was and is no danger to anyone’s children. (except when he gave out his home address while challenging another subject on Facebook, inviting them over to “continue” a heated conversation in person. oh, did he mention that the children are his, and the lawyer is his ex-wife? And she never asked to have her name redacted? No? Interesting.)

Since I wouldn’t submit to his demands, he published an Op-Ed in GV Wire attacking me, then the next day sent this letter to the City of Visalia. In it, he’s essentially begging someone, anyone, on the City Council, to agree with him, and move to have me dismissed from the CAC.

That didn’t happen. I’m still on the Committee. In fact, I’ve recently been made Vice-Chair. (and I’ve already presided over a meeting, as the Chair was not able to attend. Go me.)

There’s been a lot of drama stirred up around this nonsense. I’m comfortable in my editorial decisions regarding this entire series of events, and my actions in response to ‘Karen’. I’ll be happy to be done with it, but ‘Karens’ seldom know when to stop. We’ll see what happens next.

“Will Somebody Shut Him Up??”

Leave a comment

These are all but one of the times I’ve spoken at the Visalia City Council, during Public Comments. My first time isn’t on their website, and was in 2012, when I accepted the first June Pride Month Proclamation issued by the City of Visalia. It was the first Pride Month Proclamation by a government body in the Southern San Joaquin Valley.

I got bored, so I counted the times I appeared before the City Council, according to the minutes. As of this writing, I’m at 58 times.

There are fewer than 58 entries above, because I spoke several times at several meetings. One time I had so much to say about things that I spoke five times! Another day it was four. It’s usually just once per meeting.

I still get nervous, sometimes, but I probably enjoy it more than I should.

Lest you think I’m hogging all the time, there’s a lady that has spoken over 85 times in the same time frame. I don’t know if she enjoys it or not.

If you would like to let them know what you think about things, here’s the 4-1-1:

PUBLIC COMMENTS  

This is the time for general public comment on issues within the jurisdiction of the Visalia City Council. Each speaker tonight may speak for up to 3 minutes during this general comment period on a matter that is not on this agenda. The public may also make one comment for up to 3 minutes prior to the consideration of the Consent Calendar, and immediately before any regular agenda item is heard. The Council asks that you keep you comments concise and positive. Creative criticism, presented with appropriate courtesy, is welcome. Each speaker will be allowed three minutes and a timer will notify you when your time is expired. Please begin your comments by stating and spelling your name and providing your city of residence.

There are general public comments at the beginning of each session (work session and regular session), before the Consent Calendar, and after each item on the regular agenda, regarding that item.

Come join us at the meetings, on the first and third Mondays of each month (except on holidays, when they generally meet Tuesday). The regular session starts at 7pm, at City Hall, 707 W. Acequia. Work sessions start anywhere between 4pm and 5:30pm. Check the agenda for exact times.

“Hide my ex’s name (for the kids safety), but here’s my address!”

Leave a comment

Meet Jason Bailey of Visalia.

Jason is not happy.

I think I’ve made him mad.

Jason is upset that some previous posts of mine have included his ex-wife’s name, and he’s very concerned. He even wrote an op-ed in GV Wire about it (which means he’ll generate even more exposure of his ex-wife’s name). He neglected to include some pertinent facts as he called me out by name, though.

On June 22, 2026, I received this through Facebook Messenger:

On June 23, he sent two more messages, linking a story about an intruder at the home of the Fresno City attorney. I replied “Yes, I read your message. I’m still considering it.” (and what’s with the “MBA”? Like that somehow makes a difference?)

On July 4, I received the following message:

I think he’s mad. He posted the following as a comment on a posting on Porterville Communists, regarding me. The poster started recording me shortly after I began my remarks, but I suspect the speaker after me was who they were actually interested in. (I have no connection to this group. I don’t know if it’s a legit site for a group, or if it’s satire.)

He never contacted me in any way to ask for my phone number. Notice the hostility growing already. (It’s ridiculously easy to find my phone number online, BTW.)

On August 20, 2026, I received this SMS message:

Was it from Bailey? I don’t know, but it’s mighty coincidental, isn’t it? Like I said, it’s not difficult to find my phone number online. (As an aside, this image had to be taken before the construction began on my street, at least two months before this appeared on my phone. Whoever sent this message had been holding on to this image for a while. Stalking?)

The online anger continued. More from the Porterville Communist’s comment thread:

Now it gets really weird. He’s all worried that his ex-wife’s name will somehow put his children in danger, but he does this:

After going on about his children’s safety, he posts his address on Facebook, and challenges a stranger to come “continue this conversation”. That doesn’t seem like he’s really very concerned about his children’s safety.

So it boils down to this: His ex-wife (who has my email and can contact me directly) appears on the signatory line of an official letter from the City of Visalia’s attorneys. Bailey fears someone will see her name, and attack their children. Because – something something something.

Since he’ll blast his own address out on the Internet, I think this entire thing is simply someone who doesn’t like to be told “No”.

Unless the attorney in question asks me directly, I’m not redacting her name.

Flock and Ding Dong Dash in Porterville

Leave a comment

Image by Gemini AI

“Knocking on people’s doors and leaving the area”.

That was the ‘reason’ Porterville Police Department entered into the Flock Automated License Plate Reader system for three searches in late July and early August, 2026. Each time, they searched over 700 networks.

On July 29, 2026, they checked the system twice, for a ‘487’ (grand theft). Both times, they checked 1 network.

On August 19, 2026, they checked 710 networks for “RED TOYOTA CAMRY”.

Ding dong dash, over 700 networks. (fast runners? Fast and Furious ready to pick them up and flee the state? The long way?)

Grand theft, 1 network. (Too much to carry out of town?)

How many Red Toyota Camrys do you suspect are in those 710 networks?

I wonder if Arte Johnson’s character Wolfgang would say “verrrry interesting… but shtupid!”?

Older Entries